Model comparison
Compare AI image and video models
One matrix to decide: which model renders text, which is fastest, which gives the best motion. Scores reflect each model’s relative strength for a given intent, not an absolute benchmark.
| Metric | GPT Image 2 Image model | Nano Banana Pro Image model | Seedance 2.5 Video model | Seedance 2.0 Video model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Text rendering | 5/5 | 2/5 | — | — |
| Photorealism | 4/5 | 5/5 | — | — |
| Prompt adherence | 5/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 | 3/5 |
| Speed | 3/5 | 5/5 | 3/5 | 4/5 |
| Resolution | 4/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| Motion quality | — | — | 5/5 | 4/5 |
| Video duration | — | — | 4/5 | 3/5 |
Same prompt, different model
GPT Image 2 vs Nano Banana Pro
Run one visual brief through the two leading image workflows and choose between precise layout/text control and fast natural photography.
Open controlled comparison →
Seedance 2.5 vs Seedance 2.0
Compare the same reference-frame motion brief across cinematic quality and faster lower-cost iteration.
Open controlled comparison →
Pick by intent
Image
GPT Image 2
Best-in-class text rendering and compositional control
Read the guide →
Image
Nano Banana Pro
Fast, natural photorealism with strong scene understanding
Read the guide →
Video
Seedance 2.5
Cinematic image-to-video with fluid, natural motion
Read the guide →
Video
Seedance 2.0
Faster, lighter image-to-video for quick clips
Read the guide →
Canonical: https://modelpromptlab.com/compare. Each model guide maintains its own canonical under https://modelpromptlab.com.